4.7 Article

Synthesis of Poly(Hexamethylene Succinate-Co-Ethylene Succinate) Copolymers With Different Physical Properties and Enzymatic Hydrolyzability by Regulating the Ratio of Monomer

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.894046

Keywords

aliphatic polyester; poly(hexamethylene succinate-co-ethylene succinate); enzymatic hydrolysis; cutinase; physical properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, varying the ratios of different components in copolymers allowed for control over its properties and enzymatic hydrolysis rates. The prepared copolyesters showed higher degradation rates compared to the corresponding homopolyesters, and the degradation rates were influenced by crystallinity, melting temperature, and hydrophobicity.
Poly(hexylene succinate) (PHS), poly(ethylene succinate) (PES), and their random copolyesters, poly(hexylene succinate-co-ethylene succinate) ((P(HS-co-ES)), were synthesized by melting polycondensation. Simply varying the ratios of HS/ES afforded control over the copolymer crystallinity, thermal and mechanical properties, wettability, and enzymatic hydrolyzability as shown by X-ray diffraction (XRD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), tensile tests, and water contact angle (WCA) measurements. The enzymatic hydrolysis rates of all prepared copolyesters were higher than those of the corresponding homopolyesters. The hydrolysis rates were affected by crystallinity, melting temperature, and hydrophobicity of the copolyesters, and therefore, the degradation rates could be tuned along with the ES content. The library of copolymers prepared here with tunable degradation rates, ranging from HS-enriched to ES-enriched copolyesters, is promising for a variety of different applications. The P(HS-co-ES51) copolyester that did not fully degrade is particularly promising for use in long-term storage applications, whereas P(HS-co-ES13) and P(HS-co-ES76) that rapidly degrade are good for use in very short-term applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available