4.7 Article

Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Based on 3-Dimensional Reconstruction Technology Using Jumbo Cups

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Orthopedics

The use of a non-biological, bridging, antiprotrusio cage in complex revision hip arthroplasty and periacetabular reconstructive oncologic surgery. Is still today a valid option?: A mid/long-term survival and complications' analysis

Matteo Innocenti et al.

Summary: Burch-Schneider-like antiprotrusio cages remain helpful in addressing severe periacetabular bone losses, with higher failure and complication rates in revision THA patients compared to oncologic cases. Significant independent predictors for dislocations were the extended ileo-femoral approach and proximal femur replacement, while THA failures were predicted for infections. Surgeons should consider using less-invasive approaches to reduce dislocation rates in non-oncologic cases.

ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY (2022)

Review Surgery

Trabecular metal versus non-trabecular metal acetabular components for acetabular revision surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Xianyue Shen et al.

Summary: This study compared the cup survival and the incidence of adverse events associated with the use of trabecular metal (TM) and non-TM cups for acetabular revision surgery. The results showed no significant difference in cup survival between the two types of cups. Overall, TM cups had fewer adverse events, but the difference was not significant. The incidence of aseptic loosening and infection was significantly lower for TM cups, while the incidence of dislocation was significantly higher.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2022)

Article Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

Postoperative Hip Center Position Associated With the Range of Internal Rotation and Extension During Gait in Hip Dysplasia Patients After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Yi Hu et al.

Summary: This study found strong correlations between postoperative structures, especially hip center positions, and gait range of motion in unilateral hip dysplasia patients after total hip arthroplasty. It suggests that particular caution should be taken in surgical treatment of postoperative prosthesis structures, especially hip center positions, as they have a significant impact on hip gait motion range.

FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY (2022)

Article Orthopedics

Postoperative radiographic evaluation and simulation study for optimal cup placement in high-hip centre total hip arthroplasty

Tomoya Takasago et al.

Summary: The study findings suggest that positioning the hip centre approximately 25 mm superior to the inter-teardrop line can provide optimal bone coverage and secure cup fixation, even in cases of severe DDH.

HIP INTERNATIONAL (2021)

Article Orthopedics

The Effect of Femoral Head Size, Neck Length, and Offset on Dislocation Rates of Constrained Acetabular Liners

Yaniv Warschawski et al.

Summary: Increasing neck length was associated with lower failure rate in CALs, while larger head size did not lead to lower failure rates. Surgeons should exercise caution when considering larger acetabular shell sizes for CALs.

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2021)

Article Orthopedics

Trabecular Metal Augments for Severe Acetabular Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Follow-Up

Shane P. Russell et al.

Summary: This study provides comprehensive long-term outcomes of using TM augments for severe acetabular defects, with an estimated mean implant survivorship of 8.99 years. Despite some complications during surgery, the quality of life and joint function of patients were significantly improved postoperatively.

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2021)

Article Orthopedics

A Comparison of Revision Rates for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Between Dual Mobility and Large Femoral Head Bearings in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Subanalysis by Acetabular Component Size: An Analysis of 106,163 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties

Wayne Hoskins et al.

Summary: This study found that there is no significant difference in revision rates for dislocation or aseptic causes between dual mobility and large femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty. When stratified by acetabular component size, dual mobility can reduce dislocation for acetabular component diameter <58 mm.

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2021)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Effects of the depth of the acetabular component during simulated acetabulum reaming in total hip arthroplasty

Jianlin Zuo et al.

Summary: This study evaluated differences in rotation center, cup coverage, and biomechanical effects between conventional and anatomical techniques for acetabular cup insertion. Results showed that anatomical technique had better performance in terms of rotation center shift, coverage rate, and micromotion.

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2021)

Article Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

Optimizing the Femoral Offset for Restoring Physiological Hip Muscle Function in Patients With Total Hip Arthroplasty

Xiangjun Hu et al.

Summary: This study found that changes in FO following THA are significantly correlated with changes in hip muscle moment arms, with an increase of 2-3 mm in FO improving abductor and external rotator function. Accurate surgical planning with optimal FO reconstruction is essential for restoring normal hip muscle function in THA patients.

FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Jumbo cup in hip joint renovation may cause the center of rotation to increase

Ya-Wen Peng et al.

Summary: The study found that using a large jumbo cup elevates the rotational center of the hip joint, but it is still a feasible and effective method.

WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES (2021)

Article Orthopedics

Acetabular revision arthroplasty using press-fitted jumbo cups: an average 10-year follow-up study

Jun-Ki Moon et al.

ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY (2019)

Article Orthopedics

Mid-Term Follow-Up of Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Using Jumbo Cups

Ji Zhang et al.

ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY (2019)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Current methods of preventing aseptic loosening and improving osseointegration of titanium implants in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a review

Dragos Apostu et al.

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH (2018)

Article Orthopedics

Long-term results of acetabular reconstruction using irradiated allograft bone

C. M. Green et al.

BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2018)

Article Orthopedics

Morphological Analysis of True Acetabulum in Hip Dysplasia (Crowe Classes I-IV) Via 3-D Implantation Simulation

Yuhui Yang et al.

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2017)

Article Orthopedics

The jumbo acetabular component for acetabular revision CURTAIN CALLS AND CAVEATS

P. F. Lachiewicz et al.

BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2016)

Article Orthopedics

Uncemented Jumbo Cups for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Philipp von Roth et al.

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2015)

Article Orthopedics

Do Jumbo Cups Cause Hip Center Elevation in Revision THA? A Radiographic Evaluation

Chima D. Nwankwo et al.

CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2014)

Article Orthopedics

Leg-Length Discrepancy After Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Are Modular Stems Superior?

Yong Dou et al.

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2013)

Article Orthopedics

Acetabular Tilt Correlates with Acetabular Version and Coverage in Hip Dysplasia

Masanori Fujii et al.

CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2012)

Article Orthopedics

Influence of the acetabular cup position on hip load during arthroplasty in hip dysplasia

Goran Bicanic et al.

INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2009)

Article Orthopedics

The Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States

Kevin J. Bozic et al.

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2009)

Article Orthopedics

Acetabular revision arthroplasty using jumbo cups: an experience in Asia

Cheng-Yu Fan et al.

ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY (2008)

Article Orthopedics

The fate of cementless jumbo cups in revision hip arthroplasty

JV Patel et al.

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2003)