4.7 Article

RNA 5-Methylcytosine Regulators Contribute to Metabolism Heterogeneity and Predict Prognosis in Ovarian Cancer

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.807786

Keywords

ovarian cancer; 5-methylcytosine; RNA modification; metabolism heterogeneity; LASSO cox regression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identifies distinct m(5)C modification patterns in ovarian cancer patients, leading to metabolic heterogeneity, differences in chemotherapy sensitivity, and ultimately affecting overall survival.
5-Methylcytosine (m(5)C) is an abundant and highly conserved modification in RNAs. The dysregulation of RNA m(5)C methylation has been reported in cancers, but the regulatory network in ovarian cancer of RNA m(5)C methylation-related genes and its implication in metabolic regulation remain largely unexplored. In this study, RNA-sequencing data and clinical information of 374 ovarian cancer patients were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas database, and a total of 14 RNA m(5)C regulators were included. Through unsupervised consensus clustering, two clusters with different m(5)C modification patterns were identified with distinct survivals. According to enrichment analyses, glycosaminoglycan and collagen metabolism-related pathways were specifically activated in cluster 1, whereas fatty acid metabolism-related pathways were enriched in cluster 2, which had better overall survival (OS). Besides the metabolism heterogeneity, the higher sensitivity to platinum and paclitaxel in cluster 2 can further explain the improved OS. Ultimately, a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator prediction model formed by ALYREF, NOP2, and TET2 toward OS was constructed. In conclusion, distinct m(5)C modification pattern exhibited metabolism heterogeneity, different chemotherapy sensitivity, and consequently survival difference, providing evidence for risk stratification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available