4.7 Article

Effect of the fibre length on the mechanical anisotropy of glass fibre-reinforced polymer composites printed by Multi Jet Fusion

Journal

VIRTUAL AND PHYSICAL PROTOTYPING
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 734-748

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2022.2059638

Keywords

Multi Jet Fusion; polyamide 12; glass fibre; mechanical anisotropy; fibre length

Funding

  1. Industry Alignment Fund-IndustryCollaboration Projects Grant [I1801E0028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically investigates the effect of fibre length on the mechanical performance of MJF-printed GF/PA12 composites, showing that longer fibres promote fibre alignment but also increase porosity in the composite parts. When GFs with an average length of 226 pm are added, the ultimate tensile strength and tensile modulus of the composites are significantly improved in the powder bed spreading direction.
Mechanical anisotropy greatly influences the applications of materials printed by additive manufacturing techniques such as Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) and selective laser sintering. However, the mechanical anisotropy of MJF-printed fibre-reinforced polymer composites has not been well understood. In this work, the effect of the fibre length on the mechanical performance of MJF-printed glass fibre-reinforced polyamide 12 (GF/PA12) composites is systematically investigated. Both experimental and simulation results confirm that longer fibres are in favour of fibre alignment in the powder spreading direction. The composite parts with longer fibres exhibit higher porosity. When GFs with an average length of 226 pm are added, the ultimate tensile strength and tensile modulus of the composites measured in the powder bed spreading direction are remarkably improved by 51% and 326%, respectively, as compared with those of neat PA12 specimens. This work provides guidance for the printing of other high-strength fibre-reinforced polymer composites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available