4.5 Article

Propane dry reforming over highly active NiO-MgO solid solution catalyst for synthesis gas production

Journal

MOLECULAR CATALYSIS
Volume 524, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2022.112325

Keywords

NiO-MgO catalyst; Mechanochemical preparation method; Propane dry reforming; Whisker carbon

Funding

  1. Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) [97017638]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, NiO(x)-MgO solid-solution catalysts were prepared by a simple mechanochemical route, and their textural characteristics and catalytic efficiency in CO2 reforming of propane were investigated. The results showed that the physicochemical properties and catalytic activity of the catalysts were influenced by the NiO content, and the NiO(25)-MgO catalyst exhibited the highest activity.
In the present study, the textural characteristics and catalytic efficiency of the NiO(x)-MgO solid-solution catalysts (x =10,15,20, and 25 wt.%) were determined in CO2 reforming of propane. All samples were fabricated by the simple mechanochemical preparation route. The chemicophysical characteristics of the synthesized catalysts were determined using XRD, BET, H2-TPR, TPO, and SEM exams. The obtained results demonstrated that the physicochemical properties and catalytic activity of the samples were affected with the increment in NiO content, which is assigned to the change in the concentration of active sites and improvement of the reduction features. The NiO(25)-MgO catalyst was selected as the sample with the highest activity, and the effect of the operating factors and calcination temperature were studied over this catalyst. Also, the TPO analysis showed that the whisker carbon was formed on the spent catalyst and the sample with 25 wt.% Ni possessed the highest amount of deposited carbon. Moreover, the initial catalytic activity of all catalysts was not changed during 300 min time on stream.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available