4.5 Article

Catalytic co-gasification of glycerol/fat mixtures: experimental vs thermodynamic equilibrium results

Journal

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages 4575-4583

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-022-02523-z

Keywords

Glycerol; Fat; Gasification; Dolomite; Thermodynamic equilibrium

Funding

  1. FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [2020-POCI-01-0145-FEDER-024067]
  2. [UIDB/04730/2020]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UIDB/04730/2020] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the co-gasification of treated crude glycerol and animal fat was investigated using steam as the gasification agent. The results showed that the use of dolomite as a catalyst promoted the production of a gas rich in H-2 and CO2, and the gasification parameters increased with temperature.
In this work, the co-gasification of treated crude glycerol and animal fat was studied using steam as the gasification agent. Tests were performed in a downflow fixed bed reactor with a bed composed of catalyst particles of dolomite. The gasification process was studied using a mixture with 59% of glycerol, 3% of fat, and 38% of water and tests were carried out at 700 degrees C and 750 degrees C. The producer gas was quantified and analyzed by gas chromatography obtaining, for the tested temperatures, between 48 and 47% of H-2, about 13% of CO, 11% of CH4, and CO2 content between 30 and 27%. The results showed that the use of dolomite as a catalyst promotes the production of a gas rich in H-2 and CO2. The results also show that the gasification parameters increase with temperature. Maximum values of 0.92 m(3)/kg for dry gas yield, 70.6% for cold gas efficiency, and 58% and 40.9% for carbon and hydrogens efficiencies were obtained. The gasification process was evaluated using the non-stoichiometric chemical equilibrium model. The results obtained showed that the real gasification process does not reach chemical equilibrium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available