4.5 Article

A detailed general model of the gasification zone of a dual fluidised bed gasifier

Journal

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-022-02529-7

Keywords

Dual fluidised bed; Gasification model; Aspen plus simulation; Char gasification

Funding

  1. Dundalk Institute of technology (DkIT) PhD landscape scholarship scheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposed a semi-kinetic model of biomass gasification and introduced a numerical procedure to estimate the yields and compositions of char and tar. The simulation results were validated against experimental data, demonstrating the accuracy and robustness of the model for analyzing similar technologies or developing new ones.
Biomass gasification has proved to be a promising method of producing renewable gases. Modelling biomass gasification is instrumental in designing and optimising a biomass-based gas production plant. The current paper proposes a general semi-kinetic model of steam and air/steam gasification of solid biomass. Given the range of technologies available, the focal point of this study was to provide a detailed guide for the simulation of the gasification zone of a dual fluidised bed (DFB) gasifier. The study introduces a numerical procedure to estimate char and tar yields and compositions. Tar conversion via thermal cracking and steam reforming mechanisms were modelled using a semi-empirical approach. Simulation results, namely product gas composition, mass flow rate, and tar concentration, were validated against experimental data for the gasification zone of three DFB gasifiers with reasonable accuracy. This agreement demonstrated the robustness of the model to analyse a similar technology or in developing a new one. Aspen Plus, as a standard simulation software package, was employed to implement the model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available