4.7 Article

Improving Rabbiteye Blueberry Performance in a Calcareous Soil by Growing Plants in Pits Filled with Low-CaCO3 Growth Media

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12030574

Keywords

growth medium; ammonium nitrate; growth medium pH; nutrient concentration; chlorophyll concentration

Funding

  1. Chief Scientist of the Israeli Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to improve the performance of blueberry plants in calcareous soils using specific growth media and high levels of RNH4+. The results showed that growing blueberry in certain types of media could enhance plant performance.
Calcareous soils are not suitable for blueberry cultivation. Our aim was to improve the performance of blueberry plants in calcareous soils by using pits filled with growth media in combination with high levels of RNH4+ (proportion of N-NH4+ among the total applied N). Rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium virgatum Ait. cv. Ochlockonee) plants were grown in pits filled with a tuff/peat mixture (TP), a sandy soil (S) or a calcareous (CC), in full factorial combination with three levels of RNH4+: 33%, 66% or 100%. The two higher RNH4+ treatments decreased the pH of the low-CaCO3 (S) and no-CaCO3 (TP) media to <= 6.0 over 250 days of fertilization, but did not affect the pH of the CC soil over 650 days. Plant performance was superior in the TP and S media, as compared to the CC soil. The type of growth medium was the dominant factor accounting for the improved plant performance. The plants were sensitive to Mn deficiency in leaves during the spring period. The current results suggest that growing blueberry in pits filled with good aeration and low pH buffering capacity medium in combination with a high level of RNH4+ is a positive approach for its cultivation in calcareous soils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available