4.7 Article

Comparison of Proximal Remote Sensing Devices of Vegetable Crops to Determine the Role of Grafting in Plant Resistance to Meloidogyne incognita

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12051098

Keywords

proximal remote sensing; root-knot nematode; RGB images; rootstock; melon; pepper; eggplant; tomato; grafted plants; non-grafted plants

Funding

  1. Tunisian government from the Ministery of Higher Education and Scientific Research
  2. Institucio Catalana d'Investigacio i Estudis Avancats (ICREA) Academia, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain [RYC-2019-027818-I]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [AGL2013-49040-C2-1-R]
  5. European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) [AGL2013-49040-C2-1-R, AGL2017-89785-R, PRE2018-084265]
  6. Ministry of Science and Innovation from the Spanish Government [AGL2017-89785-R]
  7. COST Action SENSECO (Optical synergies for spatiotemporal sensing of scalable ecophysiological traits) - COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [CA17134]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the health status of different fruiting vegetables under different treatments using proximal remote sensing devices. The results showed that grafted plants were more resistant to nematode attack compared to non-grafted plants.
Proximal remote sensing devices are novel tools that enable the study of plant health status through the measurement of specific characteristics, including the color or spectrum of light reflected or transmitted by the leaves or the canopy. The aim of this study is to compare the RGB and multispectral data collected during five years (2016-2020) of four fruiting vegetables (melon, tomato, eggplant, and peppers) with trial treatments of non-grafted and grafted onto resistant rootstocks cultivated in a Meloidogyne incognita (a root-knot nematode) infested soil in a greenhouse. The proximal remote sensing of plant health status data collected was divided into three levels. Firstly, leaf level pigments were measured using two different handheld sensors (SPAD and Dualex). Secondly, canopy vigor and biomass were assessed using vegetation indices derived from RGB images and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) measured with a portable spectroradiometer (Greenseeker). Third, we assessed plant level water stress, as a consequence of the root damage by nematodes, using stomatal conductance measured with a porometer and indirectly using plant temperature with an infrared thermometer, and also the stable carbon isotope composition of leaf dry matter.. It was found that the interaction between treatments and crops (ANOVA) was statistically different for only four of seventeen parameters: flavonoid (p < 0.05), NBI (p < 0.05), NDVI (p < 0.05) and the RGB CSI (Crop Senescence Index) (p < 0.05). Concerning the effect of treatments across all crops, differences existed only in two parameters, which were flavonoid (p < 0.05) and CSI (p < 0.001). Grafted plants contained fewer flavonoids ((x) over bar = 1.37) and showed lower CSI ((x) over bar = 11.65) than non-grafted plants ((x) over bar = 1.98 and (x) over bar = 17.28, respectively, p < 0.05 and p < 0.05) when combining all five years and four crops. We conclude that the grafted plants were less stressed and more protected against nematode attack. Leaf flavonoids content and the CSI index were robust indicators of root-knot nematode impacts across multiple crop types.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available