4.7 Article

Effects of Various Nitrogen Regimes on the Ability of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) to Suppress Littleseed Canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz.)

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12030713

Keywords

rapeseed; littleseed canarygrass; nitrogen regimes; control efficacy; competitive crops; photosynthetic characteristics

Funding

  1. Middle-aged and Young Technological Innovation Talents Foundation of Yunnan Province [202105AD160021]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31960544, 31860511, 31960569]
  3. Ten Thousand Talent Program (Young Top-notch Talent) of Yunnan Province [YNWR-QNBJ-2018-201]
  4. Middle-aged and Young Academic Leader Training Foundation of Yunnan Province [2018HB054]
  5. Program for the Innovative Research Team of Yunnan Province [202005AE16003]
  6. Key Research and Development Program of Yunnan Province [2019IB007]
  7. National Key R&D Program of China [2021YFC2600400]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using crops to control invasive weeds is an important approach in agroecosystems. Nitrogen application can improve crop yield and quality, but it can also affect weed control efficacy. This study found that the amount and timing of nitrogen application have significant effects on crop yield, weed control efficacy, and the competitive ability of crops against invasive weeds. Optimal nitrogen application can help crops achieve higher yields and better weed control efficacy.
Using crops to control invasive weeds is an important approach for the long-term management of invasive species in agroecosystems. Nitrogen application can improve the yield and quality of crops, but may shift interactions of invasive weeds and crops, potentially affecting grass control ability. To explore the yield of a crop and its control efficacy of invasive weed under different nitrogen conditions, we studied the competitive effects of the high-value crop rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of invasive species littleseed canarygrass in the field experiments. The results showed that the rapeseed yield and its control efficacy on littleseed canarygrass were significantly affected (p < 0.05) under different N regimes, and the control efficacy of littleseed canarygrass by rapeseed increased first and then decreased with the increase of basal nitrogen rates, while increasing topdressing N rates increased control efficacy of littleseed canarygrass by rapeseed. In fact, yield and weed control efficacy of rapeseed was most ideal when both basal and topdressing N was 90 kg.ha(-1). We also found that N significantly impacted the competitive ability of rapeseed toward littleseed canarygrass, and rapeseed had the highest competitive ability when both basal and topdressing N was 90 kg.ha(-1). With the increase of basal nitrogen rates, competitive balance index (CB) of rapeseed increased initially but decreased beyond an optimal level. CB continually increased with increasing topdressing N rates. Our research also showed level and period of N application had a significant effect (p < 0.01) on the photosynthetic rate (Pn) and chlorophyll content (Chl) of both rapeseed and littleseed canarygrass. Under the same N application regime, the Pn and Chl of littleseed canarygrass were higher than that of rapeseed in December, while the Pn and Chl of rapeseed was higher than that of littleseed canarygrass in February. Our study indicated that photosynthetic characteristics of rapeseed and littleseed canarygrass in different growth stages differ in their sensitivity to N regimes, creating a dynamic competitive relationship. Together, our results demonstrated that optimal application of fertilizer N could help rapeseed produce higher yields and greater weed control efficacy, suggesting that future modeling or experimental studies on utilizing crops to control invasive weeds should carefully consider both timing and placement of N.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available