4.7 Article

Soil Enzyme Activity Response under the Amendment of Different Types of Biochar

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12030569

Keywords

biochar; soil; incubation; enzyme activity

Funding

  1. Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology [BN 31/2019, 38/2019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the influence of biochar produced from various organic materials on soil enzyme activity, and found that the response of enzymatic activity to biochar depends on the feedstock material and the incubation time. It is necessary to determine the TOC/TN ratio when using biochar, and additional nitrogen fertilization or mixtures of different biochars can be considered.
Biochar (BC) is a material that finds many applications in agriculture and environmental activities. The aim of the study was to define the influence of biochar produced from various organic materials: mellow compost (MC), stabilized municipal sewage sludge (MSS), pine sawdust (PS), sycamore sawdust (SS) and oak leaves (OL) on soil enzyme activity, as well as its relations with carbon and nitrogen content. After a 60-day incubation of soil and BC, the activity of dehydrogenases (DEH), catalase (CAT), alkaline (AlP) and acid (AcP) phosphatases was investigated. The basic parameters of soil were also determined: TOC, TN, DOM, pH in H2O, available phosphorus (AP). The highest AP content was obtained in the S + MSS, S + OL and S + MC variants. Enzyme activity was highest in soil with MSS BC, regardless of incubation time. After 60 days, the activity of soil enzymes was inhibited. The obtained results indicate that the response of enzymatic activity to biochar depends on the feedstock material and the incubation time. When using BC as an exogenous matter, it is necessary to determine the TOC/TN ratio. For the very wide range of this parameter, supplemental nitrogen fertilization or mixtures of different biochars should be applied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available