4.5 Article

Identification and quantification of lipids in wild and farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), and salmon feed by GC-MS

Journal

FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages 3117-3127

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2911

Keywords

farmed; n-3 fatty acids; nutrition; salmon; wild

Funding

  1. Norges Miljo--og Biovitenskapelige Universitet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fatty acid profiles of wild and farmed Atlantic salmon and salmon feed were analyzed and compared. The muscle of farmed salmon contained four times more fat than wild salmon, and the fatty acid composition differed between the two. The overall nutritional profile was found to be more beneficial in wild Atlantic salmon.
The fatty acid profiles of wild and farmed Atlantic salmon (Sairno solar) and salmon feed was elucidated and quantitated. Due to the increasing proportion of vegetable oils in salmon feed, it was of interest to evaluate the effects on the farmed salmon fatty acid profile. There was found to be four times more fat in the muscle in farmed compared to wild salmon, 8.97 +/- 0.63% and 2.14 +/- 0.32%, respectively. The contents of saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids were 15.0%, 55.4%, and 29.6%, respectively, in farmed salmon, while 26.3%, 47.4%, and 26.3% in wild salmon. The lipids were also fractioned into neutral lipids, free fatty acids, and polar lipids by solid-phase extraction. Both wild and farmed salmon contained approximately equal amount of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid with 520 and 523 mg/100 g fish muscle, respectively. The salmons of both kinds were evaluated from a health perspective by discussing the contents of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids, saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids together with nutritional quality indices. In conjunction with a lower fat intake by consumption, the wild Atlantic salmon displayed the most nutritionally beneficial profile.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available