4.7 Article

Improving Widescale Monitoring of Ectoparasite Presence in Northern Canadian Wildlife with the Aid of Citizen Science

Journal

INSECTS
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/insects13040380

Keywords

parasite; ticks; Dermacentor albipictus; winter tick; wildlife health; citizen science; hunting; sampling; surveillance; monitoring

Categories

Funding

  1. Climate Change Preparedness in the North Program, Crown Indigenous Rural and Northern Affairs Canada (CCPN-CIRNAC) [1718HQ-000103]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant [2016-06301, 2020-05935]
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) John R. Evans Leaders Fund [35341]
  4. Ministry of Research, Innovation and Sciences (MRIS) Ontario Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surveying winter ticks on moose and caribou hosts in Yukon, Canada, has been challenging. To enhance sampling efforts, a three-year citizen science program was implemented, resulting in increased sample submissions and expanded geographic range through engaging hunters and utilizing social media.
Simple Summary Surveying ticks on wildlife hosts consistently over time and across space presents many challenges. In Yukon, Canada, the winter tick, Dermacentor albipictus, is a blood-feeding parasite that can cause significant losses of hair and blood in moose and other wildlife. The impacts of winter tick infestation in wildlife hosts in this northern region are not well documented. To enhance existing surveillance of winter ticks in Yukon, we implemented a three-year citizen science program, the Yukon Winter Tick Monitoring Project (YWTMP) to engage hunters in the collection of underrepresented moose and caribou samples. Social media, participation incentives, and hide-sampling kits distributed to hunters increased the combined number of annual moose and caribou hide submissions almost 100-fold, and the geographical range of samples by almost 500 km, compared with submission numbers in the previous seven years. Citizen science samples were also used to detect previously unknown infection localities on moose in southeastern Yukon that are spatially separate to known infestations found on elk and deer, helping to build a better picture of infection dynamics on different host animals. Engaging with key demographic groups using structured citizen science programs like the YWTMP can significantly expand sampling efforts in remote areas while maintaining systematic sampling methods to monitor parasites of wildlife health concern. Sampling hides from harvested animals is commonly used for passive monitoring of ectoparasites on wildlife hosts, but often relies heavily on community engagement to obtain spatially and temporally consistent samples. Surveillance of winter ticks (Dermacentor albipictus) on moose (Alces alces) and caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) hosts in Yukon, Canada, has relied in part on voluntary submission of hides by hunters since 2011, but few samples were submitted. To enhance sampling efforts on underrepresented moose and caribou hosts, we implemented a three-year citizen science program, the Yukon Winter Tick Monitoring Project (YWTMP), to better engage with hunters in hide sample collection. A combination of in-person and social media outreach, incentivized engagement, and standardized hide sampling kits increased voluntary submissions of moose and caribou hides almost 100-fold since surveillance began. Citizen science samples expanded the northernmost geographic extent of existing sampling efforts for moose by 480 km and for caribou by 650 km to reach 67.5 degrees N latitude. Samples also resulted in new detections of winter ticks on moose hides that are spatially separate to those submitted for other cervids in Yukon. Findings from the YWTMP have provided an essential baseline to monitor future winter tick host-parasite dynamics in the region and highlighted priority areas for ongoing tick surveillance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available