4.4 Review

Amputation stump management: A narrative review

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES
Volume 10, Issue 13, Pages 3981-3988

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.3981

Keywords

Amputation; Amputee; Management; Rehabilitation; Stump; Review

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea Grant - Korean government [NRF2021R1A2C1013073]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review provides an overview of basic methods for managing amputation stumps, including rehabilitation processes, desensitization, dressing application, prosthesis fitting, and limb positioning to improve the quality of life for amputees.
In this review intended for medical staff involved in patient rehabilitation, we provided an overview of the basic methods for managing amputation stumps. After the amputation surgery, it is imperative to optimize the remaining physical abilities of the amputee through rehabilitation processes, including postoperative rehabilitation, desensitization, and continuous application of soft or rigid dressings for pain reduction and shaping of the stump. Depending on the situation, a prosthesis may be worn in the early stage of recovery or an immediate postoperative prosthesis may be applied to promote stump maturation. Subsequently, to maintain the range of motion of the stump and to prevent deformation, the remaining portion of the limb should be positioned to prevent contracture. Continuous exercises should also be performed to improve muscle strength to ensure that the amputee is able to perform activities of daily living, independently. Additionally, clean wound or edema management of the stump is necessary to prevent problems associated with wearing the prosthesis. Our review is expected to contribute to the establishment of basic protocols that will be useful for stump management from the time of completion of amputation surgery to the fitting of a prosthesis to optimize patient recovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available