4.6 Article

The Refinement of Petri Net with Inhibitor Arcs Based Representation for Embedded Systems

Journal

ELECTRONICS
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics11091389

Keywords

Petri nets; refinement; modeling; reachability; embedded system design

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2016FM19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces the modeling and analysis methods for embedded systems and proposes the place refinement approach and the place set refinement approach for mitigating the state space explosion problem of PIRES+. These methods are illustrated through an example of a network communication system.
Embedded systems are widely used in various devices. PRES+ (Petri net- based Representation for Embedded Systems) has been used to model and analyze embedded systems. However, it cannot characterize the priority of events, and cannot fully express the complex data flow and control flow. To solve this problem, inhibitor arcs are added to PRES+ and PIRES+ (PRES+ with Inhibitor arcs) is obtained. However, PIRES+'s state space explosion problem is a handicap when modeling, verifying, and controlling complex, large embedded systems. To mitigate the state space explosion problem of PIRES+ and analyze complex embedded systems, we propose the place refinement approach and the place set refinement approach for PIRES+. Under specific conditions, several important properties of PIRES+, such as timing, functionality, reachability, liveness, and boundedness, are preserved by using these refinement approaches. In order to illustrate the effectiveness of these refinement methods, as an example, the modeling and analysis of a network communication system is proposed. The refinement methods proposed have certain feasibility and practicability and provide a more practical theoretical basis for the modeling of some embedded systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available