4.6 Article

Assessment of Dual-Tree Complex Wavelet Transform to Improve SNR in Collaboration with Neuro-Fuzzy System for Heart-Sound Identification

Journal

ELECTRONICS
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics11060938

Keywords

heart-sound classification; dual-tree complex wavelet transform; adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system; signal denoising

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research paper proposes a novel denoising method to improve heart-condition identification using heart-sound signals. The method combines the use of DTCWT and ANFIS classifier, resulting in improved signal-to-noise ratio and successful classification of heart-sound recordings.
The research paper proposes a novel denoising method to improve the outcome of heart-sound (HS)-based heart-condition identification by applying the dual-tree complex wavelet transform (DTCWT) together with the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference System (ANFIS) classifier. The method consists of three steps: first, preprocessing to eliminate 50 Hz noise; second, applying four successive levels of DTCWT to denoise and reconstruct the time-domain HS signal; third, to evaluate ANFIS on a total of 2735 HS recordings from an international dataset (PhysioNet Challenge 2016). The results show that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with DTCWT was significantly improved (p < 0.001) as compared to original HS recordings. Quantitatively, there was an 11% to many decibel (dB)-fold increase in SNR after DTCWT, representing a significant improvement in denoising HS. In addition, the ANFIS, using six time-domain features, resulted in 55-86% precision, 51-98% recall, 53-86% f-score, and 54-86% MAcc compared to other attempts on the same dataset. Therefore, DTCWT is a successful technique in removing noise from biosignals such as HS recordings. The adaptive property of ANFIS exhibited capability in classifying HS recordings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available