4.7 Article

Fractal Analysis of Pore Structure Differences Between Shale and Sandstone Based on the Nitrogen Adsorption Method

Journal

NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 1759-1773

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11053-022-10056-5

Keywords

Pore structure; Fractal dimension; Nitrogen adsorption; Shale; Sandstone

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42172159, 42004086]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [CUGGC04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pore structure is a critical factor influencing the physical properties of oil and gas reservoirs, and it varies greatly with the reservoir rock type. This study analyzed the pore structures of shale and sandstone using low-pressure nitrogen adsorption experiments and fractal theory. The results showed significant differences in pore shape, distribution, specific surface area, and pore size between shale and sandstone. Fractal dimensions were found to be important parameters in characterizing the pore structure. The study highlights the usefulness of fractal theory in characterizing unconventional reservoirs.
Pore structure, a critical factor influencing the physical properties of oil and gas reservoirs, shows great variation with the reservoir rock type. Efficient exploration and development of oil and gas resources require comprehensive understanding of pore structure differences between various reservoirs. In this study, to clarify these differences, pore size distributions and pore structure parameters were obtained through low-pressure nitrogen (N-2) adsorption-desorption experiments using shale, low-permeability sandstone, and tight sandstone as rock types. Pore space fractal dimension obtained from a proposed calculating method and pore surface fractal dimension obtained from the Frenkel-Halsey-Hill model were combined with N-2 adsorption results to analyze quantitatively the pore structures of shale and sandstone. The results show that shale consisted mainly of inkbottle-shaped pores whereas sandstone was composed of slit-shaped pores. Compared with sandstone, shale had a larger specific surface area but smaller average pore diameter and pore volume. In addition, the pore structure heterogeneity and pore surface irregularity of shale were more significant, considering its larger fractal dimensions. Relationships among fractal dimensions and porosity, permeability, and pore structure parameters explained that pore size and pore distribution were the main influencing factors of porosity and permeability. These results highlight the practicability of fractal theory in characterizing pore structure and petrophysical properties of unconventional reservoirs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available