4.7 Article

Safety assessment of commercial antimicrobial food packaging: Triclosan and microplastics, a closer look

Journal

FOOD PACKAGING AND SHELF LIFE
Volume 31, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100780

Keywords

Antimicrobial food packaging; Triclosan; Migration; EU regulatory compliance; Microplastics; Human health

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation (MINECO) [CTQ2017-85673-R, PID2020-116067RB-100]
  2. Comunidad Autonoma of Madrid (Spain)
  3. FEDER program [PB2018/BAA-4393]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that TCS migration was observed in commercial antibacterial food containers despite the EU ban on TCS. Moreover, microplastics were found to leach from the surface of these containers, possibly leading to the transfer of TCS into food and posing a potential health risk to consumers.
Antimicrobial food packaging incorporating triclosan (TCS) was banned in the European Union in 2010, while in other countries; regulations on the use of TCS in food contact materials are unclear. In this context, this work has investigated compliance with the EU ban on TCS in commercial antibacterial polypropylene food containers sold through online sales platforms.TCS was present in all food containers tested. Migration studies to food simulants, under different conditions (e.g., conventional and microwave heating, single and repeated use) have been performed according to Regulation 10/2011. The highest TCS migration levels corresponded to 95% ethanol at 40 degrees C for 10 days, although migration rates varied between different containers. Furthermore, microplastics were found to leach from the surface of antibacterial food containers when exposed to microwave heating or oven heating. Therefore, microplastics containing TCS might enter food in contact with the containers during use, posing a potential health risk for consumers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available