4.7 Review

Different Methods and Formulations of Drugs and Vaccines for Nasal Administration

Journal

PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14051073

Keywords

drug delivery; intranasal; vaccine; immunity; nanotechnology

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program, National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science and Technology
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2017R1A2B2003575, NRF-2020R1A2C1006398]
  3. Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea, under the ICT Creative Consilience program [IITP-2022-2020-0-01819]
  4. Korea Health Technology RD Project [HI17C0387]
  5. Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI)
  6. Ministry of Health Welfare
  7. Korea University grant
  8. Korea University Medical Center
  9. Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nasal drug delivery has advantages over other routes, but also has limitations. This review provides an overview of nasal anatomy and mucosal environment, explores methods to enhance absorption and improve delivery, and discusses future prospects.
Nasal drug delivery is advantageous when compared with other routes of drug delivery as it avoids the hepatic first-pass effect, blood-brain barrier penetration, and compliance issues with parenteral administration. However, nasal administration also has some limitations, such as its low bioavailability due to metabolism on the mucosal surface, and irreversible damage to the nasal mucosa due to the ingredients added into the formula. Moreover, the method of nasal administration is not applicable to all drugs. The current review presents the nasal anatomy and mucosal environment for the nasal delivery of vaccines and drugs, as well as presents various methods for enhancing nasal absorption, and different drug carriers and delivery devices to improve nasal drug delivery. It also presents future prospects on the nasal drug delivery of vaccines and drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available