4.6 Article

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Overexpression and Amplification in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Large-Scale Retrospective Study in Chinese Population

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.842787

Keywords

colorectal cancer; HER2; methodology; amplification; prognosis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81972249, 81802367, 81802361, 82172702]
  2. Clinical Research Project of Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center [SHDC2020CR4068]
  3. Shanghai Clinical Science and Technology Innovation Project of Municipal Hospital [SHDC12020102]
  4. Fudan University Double First-class Original Research Personalized Support Project [XM03190634]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [21ZR1414900]
  6. Shanghai Science and Technology Development Fund [19MC1911000]
  7. Clinical Research Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Committee [20194Y0348]
  8. Shanghai Anticancer Association EYAS project [SACA-CY19B10]
  9. Shanghai Rising Stars of Medical Talents Youth Development Program Youth Medical Talents-Specialist Program [SHWSRS (2020)_087]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the HER2 status in a large cohort of Chinese colorectal cancer patients and found a positive correlation between HER2 expression and female gender. However, there was no significant correlation between HER2 status and patient survival according to any evaluation criterion used. Furthermore, HER2 protein expression was significantly negatively correlated with RAS/BRAF mutations according to the HERACLES criteria.
BackgroundCumulative evidence in colorectal cancer (CRC) suggests that patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression or amplification can benefit from anti-HER2 therapy. The purpose of our study was to evaluate HER2 status and its correlation with clinicopathological characteristics and survival according to currently utilized HER2 diagnostic criteria in a large cohort of Chinese CRC patients. MethodsHER2 protein expression was tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from 4,836 CRC patients in our institution. Breast cancer (BC) and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) criteria, as well as the HERACLES criteria, were used for the determination of HER2 status. Dual-color silver-enhanced in situ hybridization (DSISH) was performed in all IHC 2+~3+ cases determined by BC/GEA criteria. ResultsThe HER2 expression rate of IHC (1+~3+) was 7.01% (339/4,836) and 6.02% (291/4,836) in CRCs based on the BC/GEA criteria and the HERACLES criteria, respectively, while combined DSISH results in the HER2 amplification/overexpression ratio of 3.39% (164/4,836) in our cohort. HER2 expression detected by IHC was positively correlated with the female gender, whereas the HER2 overexpression/amplification showed no correlation with any clinicopathological parameter. In addition, no significant correlation was found between HER2 statuses and either disease-free survival or overall survival regardless of the evaluation criterion used. However, patients with HER2 1+ CRC showed a tendency of having the shortest overall survival as compared with any other group of patients according to the HERACLES criteria, and this trend has always existed in the rectal location, T3 stage, and TNM stage II, medium differentiation, and perineural invasion stratified group. Furthermore, the HER2 protein expression was significantly negatively correlated with RAS/BRAF mutations according to the HERACLES criteria. ConclusionTo our knowledge, this is the largest study of HER2 status in Asian patients with CRC. Our findings suggest that the current most commonly used HERACLES criteria might be too strict for patients with CRC. Future studies are needed to explore the most suitable criteria for screening CRC patients who could benefit from anti-HER2 therapy as much as possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available