4.6 Article

Second Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma After Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.801090

Keywords

nasopharyngeal carcinoma; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; second primary lung adenocarcinoma; cumulative incidence risk; survival

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine the long-term risk of second primary lung adenocarcinoma (SPLAC) in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The results showed that the incidence of SPLAC in NPC patients after IMRT was similar to that of the normal population, and most cases were detected in early stages during follow-up, with good surgical efficacy.
ObjectiveThe improvement of the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) has prolonged the survival of patients, and the incidence of the second tumor has gradually increased. Among them, second primary lung adenocarcinoma (SPLAC) attributes the highest incidence. This study aimed to determine the long-term risk of SPLAC in NPC patients after IMRT. MethodsFrom May 2005 to May 2018, a total of 1,102 non-metastatic NPC patients who received IMRT in our hospital were enrolled, and the incidence and efficacy of SPLAC were followed up in the long term. ResultsOver a median follow-up period of 66 months, a total of 22 cases of SPLAC were observed, with an incidence of 2.0%. The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year cumulative risks of SPLAC were 0.4%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 1.1%, and 1.7%, respectively. During follow-up, 90.9% (20/22) of the SPLAC detected was in early stage, and the recurrence rate of surgery alone was 5.3% (1/19). ConclusionIn NPC patients, the proportion of SPLAC after IMRT was similar to that of the normal population, and most of them were found in early stage during follow-up, with good surgical efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available