4.6 Article

From institutional work to transition work: Actors creating, maintaining and disrupting transition processes

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 251-267

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2021.12.005

Keywords

Institutional work; Transition work; Energy transition; Actors; Disruption

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation
  2. University of Oldenburg [316848319]
  3. DFG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This contribution introduces the concept of 'transition work' and explores its application in the analysis of transition processes. Through case studies on energy transitions in Germany, the study reveals that creating, maintaining, and disrupting are integral activities in transitions. It also highlights the importance of maintaining activities in stabilizing transition processes.
This contribution outlines how transition processes can be analysed as 'transition work'. We draw on the concept of institutional work, review existing applications in transition research and adapt it to transitions, labelling the result 'transition work'. Transition work details how actors 'create', 'maintain' and 'disrupt' transition processes. By analysing instances around the evolution of policies, organisations, networks and technologies in two cases of energy transitions in Germany, we observe how actors apply transition work to accelerate and decelerate transitions. Despite analysing very different cases, we find that creating, maintaining, and disrupting are all integral activities of transition processes. Particularly, we observe a lack of stabilisation of a transition process where 'maintain' activities of transition proponents are scarce: Maintain activities cannot only preserve the status quo, but also stabilise transition activities. For understanding disruption, likewise, we need to consider both disruptive and defensive work.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available