Journal
CANCERS
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092112
Keywords
opioid-induced constipation; magnesium oxide; naldemedine; spontaneous bowel movement
Categories
Funding
- Yokohama City University Hospital
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Opioids are commonly used in cancer pain management, but can cause constipation as a side effect. Traditional laxatives may not be effective in preventing opioid-induced constipation. However, a new drug called naldemedine has been found to safely and effectively treat this constipation without affecting pain relief. This study compared the effectiveness of magnesium oxide and naldemedine in preventing opioid-induced constipation, and found that naldemedine significantly prevented deterioration in constipation-specific quality of life and reduced gastrointestinal adverse effects compared to magnesium oxide.
Simple Summary Opioids are used in cancer pain management, however, their continuous use may not be tolerable owing to adverse effects such as constipation, sleepiness, nausea, and respiratory depression. Opioid-induced constipation reduces the quality of life of patients, and osmotic laxatives are conventionally recommended for preventing opioid-induced constipation. Recently, naldemedine, a peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist, can be used to safely and effectively treat opioid-induced constipation based on its etiological mechanism, without affecting central analgesia. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of magnesium oxide with that of naldemedine in preventing opioid-induced constipation. Naldemedine significantly prevented deterioration in the quality of defecation (the Japanese Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life and complete spontaneous bowel movement) and reduced gastrointestinal adverse effects, mainly nausea, compared with magnesium oxide during 12-week administration. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) may occur in patients receiving opioid treatment, decreasing their quality of life (QOL). We compared the effectiveness of magnesium oxide (MgO) with that of naldemedine (NAL) in preventing OIC. This proof-of-concept, randomized controlled trial (registration number UMIN000031891) involved 120 patients with cancer scheduled to receive opioid therapy. The patients were randomly assigned and stratified by age and sex to receive MgO (500 mg, thrice daily) or NAL (0.2 mg, once daily) for 12 weeks. The change in the average Japanese version of Patient Assessment of Constipation QOL (JPAC-QOL) from baseline to 2 weeks was assessed as the primary endpoint. The other endpoints were spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) and complete SBMs (CSBMs). Deterioration in the mean JPAC-QOL was significantly lower in the NAL group than in the MgO group after 2 weeks. There were fewer adverse events in the NAL group than in the MgO group. Neither significant differences in the change in SBMs between the groups nor serious adverse events/deaths were observed. The CSBM rate was higher in the NAL group than in the MgO group at 2 and 12 weeks. In conclusion, NAL significantly prevented deterioration in constipation-specific QOL and CSBM rate compared with MgO.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available