4.6 Article

Potential Prognostic Markers for Relapsed/Refractory vs. Responsive Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112752

Keywords

acute myeloid leukemia (AML); prognostic markers; epigenetic regulation

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Council of Lithuania [S-SEN-20-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to identify new potential prognostic markers for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment. The analysis showed that refractory AML patients had significantly higher expression of oncogenic MYC and WT1 genes, as well as metabolic IDH1 gene. On the other hand, the expression of cell cycle inhibitor CDKN1A (p21) gene was significantly lower in refractory patients. Additionally, refractory patients had higher expression of HDAC2 and TET1 genes, and lower expression of KAT6A and GATAD2A genes compared to treatment responsive patients. The study also suggested that combining epigenetic modulation with standard treatment may be beneficial.
Simple Summary Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common blood cancer in the elderly, which progresses rapidly and is often fatal. The prognosis for AML remains poor in most older patients: only about 15% of patients over 60 years of age can recover. Our aim is to determine new potential AML clinical treatment prognosis markers. We analyzed certain genes, proteins and the epigenome profile in therapy-resistant and responsive AML patients at diagnosis stage and after clinical treatment. We determined that MYC, WT1, IDH1, CDKN1A, HDAC2, TET1, KAT6A and GATAD2A gene expression changes might characterize refractory AML. Therefore, these genes could have an impact for AML prognosis. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease. A significant proportion of AML patients is refractory to clinical treatment or relapses. Our aim is to determine new potential AML clinical treatment prognosis markers. We investigated various cell fate and epigenetic regulation important gene level differences between refractory and responsive AML patient groups at diagnosis stage and after clinical treatment using RT-qPCR. We demonstrated that oncogenic MYC and WT1 and metabolic IDH1 gene expression was significantly higher and cell cycle inhibitor CDKN1A (p21) gene expression was significantly lower in refractory patients' bone marrow cells compared to treatment responsive patients both at diagnosis and after clinical treatment. Moreover, we determined that, compared to clinical treatment responsive patients, refractory patients possess a significantly higher gene expression of histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) and epigenetic DNA modulator TET1 and a significantly lower gene expression of lysine acetyltransferase 6A (KAT6A) and nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) complex component GATAD2A. We suggest that MYC, WT1, IDH1, CDKN1A, HDAC2, TET1, KAT6A and GATAD2A gene expression changes might characterize refractory AML. Thus, they might be useful for AML prognosis. Additionally, we suggest that epigenetic modulation might be beneficial in combination with standard treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available