4.7 Article

Expression of Inflammatory Markers in the Muscles of Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy According to the Presence of Interstitial Lung Disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11113021

Keywords

myositis; polymyositis; dermatomyositis; interstitial lung disease; HLA-DR antigens

Funding

  1. Jeju National University Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the expression of HLA-DR on myofibers was associated with the presence of interstitial lung disease in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.
Background: Several studies have identified factors associated with the development of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). However, few have assessed the association between ILD and muscle biopsy findings, including inflammatory marker expressions analyzed using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods: Muscle biopsies from patients who were newly diagnosed with IIMs between 2000 and 2017 were reviewed. ILD was diagnosed based on chest computed tomography findings at the time of diagnosis of IIMs. IHC staining was performed for CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, CD163, MX1, MHC class I, and HLA-DR. The factors associated with the presence of ILD were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Results: Of the 129 patients with IIM, 49 (38%) had ILD. In the muscle biopsy findings, CD4 expression, MX1 expression on immune cells, and expression of MHC class I and HLA-DR on myofibers were more common in patients with ILD than those without. In the logistic regression analysis, the HLA-DR expression on myofibers was significantly associated with the risk of ILD (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.24-4.90, p = 0.012) after adjusting for pathologic findings, clinical features, and autoantibodies. Conclusion: The expression of HLA-DR on myofibers was associated with the presence of ILD in patients with IIM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available