4.7 Article

OCT Angiography Fractal Analysis of Choroidal Neovessels Secondary to Central Serous Chorioretinopathy, in a Caucasian Cohort

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051443

Keywords

central serous chorioretinopathy; fractal analysis; indocyanine green angiography; optical coherence tomography angiography; polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; type 1 choroidal neovascularization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the incidence and features of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) patients using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A). Complex CSCR is often complicated by type 1 CNV and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) with similar neovascular architecture, suggesting they may be different stages of the same neovascular process. Future studies incorporating demographic data, imaging morphology, and treatment response are needed for definitive conclusions.
Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) can be complicated by different types of choroidal neovascularization (CNV). The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence and quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) features of CSCR-related CNVs. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study including 102 eyes of 102 Caucasian patients with acute or complex CSCR. All patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmological examination. Quantitative OCT-A parameters, including vascular perfusion density (VPD), fractal dimension (FD), and lacunarity (LAC), were measured in CNV eyes. Results: Forty eyes (39.2%) had acute CSCR, whereas the remaining sixty-two (60.8%) had complex CSCR. CNV was observed in 37 (36.27%) eyes, all of which had the complex form. CNVs were classified as type 1 CNV in 11/37 (29.73%) cases and as polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) in the remaining 26/37 (70.27%). Overall, the mean VPD, FD, and LAC of CSCR-related CNVs were 0.52 +/- 0.20%, 1.44 +/- 0.12, and 2.40 +/- 1.1, respectively. No significant difference between type 1 CNV and PCV was found. Conclusion: Complex CSCR is often complicated by type 1 CNV and PCV with similar neovascular architecture and branching complexity, a finding supporting the idea that they might be different stages of the same neovascular process. Future OCT-A fractal analysis-based studies that also include other relevant parameters, such as demographics, presentation, morphology on multimodal imaging, and response to treatment, are necessary before drawing any definitive conclusions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available