4.7 Review

Benefits from Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11082149

Keywords

post-stroke; rehabilitation; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; noninvasive brain stimulation; motor function; cognitive function; depression; aphasia

Funding

  1. Medical University of Lodz [503/6-127-05/503-51-001-19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review examines the current evidence of the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in post-stroke rehabilitation and discusses the effects of different stimulation types on motor function, cognitive function, depression, and aphasia. The findings suggest that rTMS is safe and can modulate cortical excitability to improve overall performance. However, the methodological problem of conducting double-blinding studies in stroke rehabilitation research is highlighted.
Stroke is an acute neurovascular central nervous system (CNS) injury and one of the main causes of long-term disability and mortality. Post-stroke rehabilitation as part of recovery is focused on relearning lost skills and regaining independence as much as possible. Many novel strategies in neurorehabilitation have been introduced. This review focuses on current evidence of the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), in post-stroke rehabilitation. Moreover, we present the effects of specific interventions, such as low-frequency or high-frequency rTMS therapy, on motor function, cognitive function, depression, and aphasia in post-stroke patients. Collected data suggest that high-frequency stimulation (5 Hz and beyond) produces an increase in cortical excitability, whereas low-frequency stimulation (<= 1 Hz) decreases cortical excitability. Accumulated data suggest that rTMS is safe and can be used to modulate cortical excitability, which may improve overall performance. Side effects such as tingling sensation on the skin of the skull or headache are possible. Serious side effects such as epileptic seizures can be avoided by adhering to international safety guidelines. We reviewed clinical studies that present promising results in general recovery and stimulating neuroplasticity. This article is an overview of the current rTMS state of knowledge related to benefits in stroke, as well as its cellular and molecular mechanisms. In the stroke rehabilitation literature, there is a key methodological problem of creating double-blinding studies, which are very often impossible to conduct.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available