4.7 Article

Primary Liver Transplantation vs. Transplant after Kasai Portoenterostomy for Infants with Biliary Atresia

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11113012

Keywords

biliary atresia; kasai portoenterostomy; primary liver transplantation; outcomes

Funding

  1. Robert E. Schneider Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared transplant outcomes in children with biliary atresia who underwent primary liver transplant (pLT) with or without a prior Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE). The results showed comparable patient and graft survival between the pLT and failed KPE groups. The study suggests that pLT may be a beneficial option for patients predicted to have early failure of KPE.
Introduction: Primary liver transplants (pLT) in patients with biliary atresia (BA) are infrequent, since most babies with BA undergo a prior Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE). This study compared transplant outcomes in children with BA with or without a prior KPE. We hypothesized that pLT have less morbidity and better outcomes compared to those done after a failed KPE. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with BA transplanted at our institution was performed. Patients were included if they received a pLT or if they were transplanted less than 2 years from KPE. Outcomes were compared between those groups. Comparisons were also made based on era (early: 1997-2008 vs. modern: 2009-2020). p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Patients who received a pLT were older at diagnosis (141.5 +/- 46.0 vs. KPE 67.1 +/- 25.5 days, p < 0.001). The time between diagnosis and listing for transplant was shorter in the pLT group (44.5 +/- 44.7 vs. KPE 140.8 +/- 102.8 days, p < 0.001). In the modern era, the calculated PELD score for the pLT was significantly higher (23 +/- 8 vs. KPE 16 +/- 8, p = 0.022). Two waitlist deaths occurred in the KPE group (none in pLT, p = 0.14). Both the duration of transplant surgery and transfusion requirements were similar in both groups. There was a significant improvement in graft survival in transplants after KPE between eras (early era 84.3% vs. modern era 97.8%, p = 0.025). The 1-year patient and graft survival after pLT was 100%. Conclusions: Patient and graft survival after pLT are comparable to transplants after a failed KPE but pLT avoids a prior intervention. There was no significant difference in pre- or peri-transplant morbidity between groups other than wait list mortality. A multicenter collaboration with more patients may help demonstrate the potential benefits of pLT in patients predicted to have early failure of KPE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available