4.7 Article

Host Traits and Phylogeny Contribute to Shaping Coral-Bacterial Symbioses

Journal

MSYSTEMS
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00044-22

Keywords

coral microbiome; symbiosis; bacteria; host traits; rare microbiome; coral microbiome

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP200101613]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Career Development fellowship [GNT1159458]
  3. Environmental Microbiology Research Initiative at the University of Melbourne
  4. Native Australian Animal Trust
  5. Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment
  6. Australian Research Council [DP200101613] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The success of tropical scleractinian corals depends on their ability to establish symbioses with microbial partners. This study investigated the influence of host phylogeny, skeletal architecture, and reproductive mode on the coral microbiome composition. The results showed that these factors contributed to shaping the presence and relative abundance of bacterial symbionts in the coral holobiont. Additionally, the study revealed differences in the tissue and skeleton bacterial communities, suggesting that the skeleton can act as a microbial reservoir. The findings provide insights into coral-bacterial symbioses and have implications for reef management measures.
The success of tropical scleractinian corals depends on their ability to establish symbioses with microbial partners. Host phylogeny and traits are known to shape the coral microbiome, but to what extent they affect its composition remains unclear. Here, by using 12 coral species representing the complex and robust clades, we explored the influence of host phylogeny, skeletal architecture, and reproductive mode on the microbiome composition, and further investigated the structure of the tissue and skeleton bacterial communities. Our results show that host phylogeny and traits explained 14% of the tissue and 13% of the skeletal microbiome composition, providing evidence that these predictors contributed to shaping the holobiont in terms of presence and relative abundance of bacterial symbionts. Based on our data, we conclude that host phylogeny affects the presence of specific microbial lineages, reproductive mode predictably influences the microbiome composition, and skeletal architecture works like a filter that affects bacterial relative abundance. We show that the /3-diversity of coral tissue and skeleton microbiomes differed, but we found that a large overlapping fraction of bacterial sequences were recovered from both anatomical compartments, supporting the hypothesis that the skeleton can function as a microbial reservoir. Additionally, our analysis of the microbiome structure shows that 99.6% of tissue and 99.7% of skeletal amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were not consistently present in at least 30% of the samples, suggesting that the coral tissue and skeleton are dominated by rare bacteria. Together, these results provide novel insights into the processes driving coral-bacterial symbioses, along with an improved understanding of the scleractinian microbiome. IMPORTANCE The rapid decline of coral reefs, driven by climate changes, calls for manipulative interventions such as the use of probiotics, which can assist the resilience of these ecosystems. However, many knowledge gaps still exist in our understanding of coral-bacterial symbioses that need to be addressed before effectively applying interventions like probiotics. Here, by investigating the microbiomes of 12 common coral species we show that the associations with bacterial symbionts, thought to be critical to coral health, were influenced to some extent by host phylogeny, skeletal architecture, reproduction, and anatomical compartments. We therefore propose that fundamental and applied functional exploration of coral-associated microbes will help inform successful reef management measures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available