4.8 Article

Tri-branched gels: Rubbery materials with the lowest branching factor approach the ideal elastic limit

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 8, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abk0010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [19J22561, 19K14672, 21H04688, 20H05733]
  2. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) CREST grant [JPMJCR1992]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K14672, 19J22561, 20H05733, 21H04688] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unlike hard materials, rubbery materials can withstand large deformations due to their conformational degree of freedom. This study found that tri-branching allows for elastic deformation near the theoretical limit through reversible strain-induced crystallization, while tetra-branched networks do not exhibit this phenomenon. These findings will prompt a paradigm shift in the development of rubbery materials.
Unlike hard materials such as metals and ceramics, rubbery materials can endure large deformations due to the large conformational degree of freedom of the cross-linked polymer network. However, the effect of the network's branching factor on the ultimate mechanical properties has not yet been clarified. This study shows that tri-branching, which entails the lowest branching factor, results in a large elastic deformation near the theoretical upper bound. This ideal elastic limit is realized by reversible strain-induced crystallization, providing on-demand reinforcement. The enhanced reversible strain-induced crystallization is observed in the tri-branched and not in the tetra-branched network. A mathematical theory of structural rigidity is used to explain the difference in the chain orientation. Although tetra-branched polymers have been preferred since the development of vulcanization, these findings highlighting the merits of tri-branching will prompt a paradigm shift in the development of rubbery materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available