4.4 Article

Structural, Electrochemical and Catalytic Elucidation of Cyclooctadiene Ru(II)-Nitrile Complexes of the Type [RuCl2(cod)(NCR)2]

Journal

CHEMISTRYSELECT
Volume 7, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/slct.202201432

Keywords

Cyclic voltammetry; Density functional calculations; Nitrile ligands; Ruthenium; Transfer hydrogenation

Funding

  1. South African National Research Foundation [117995, 138280]
  2. University of Pretoria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A facile synthesis method was reported for a range of cyclooctadiene Ru(II) complexes with different nitrile ligands, and solid-state characterization was performed for these complexes. The complexes displayed instability in solution, leading to spontaneous dimerization. Varied catalytic activity was observed using these complexes, with the highest activity observed in the transfer hydrogenation of ketones.
The facile synthesis of a range of eleven cyclooctadiene Ru(II) complexes of the type [RuCl2(cod)(NCR)(2)] featuring different nitrile ligands using two synthetic routes is reported. The solid-state characterization (SCXRD) of twelve complexes is also described. Complex instability in solution led to spontaneous dimerization to yield a dimeric complex. Using these complexes, varied catalytic activity was observed in six different transformation reactions, of which the transfer hydrogenation of ketones was the highest (yields of 99 % after 30 minutes, TOF=156 h(-1)). The electrochemical (CV), DFT, and catalytic properties of the complexes evaluated showed that while the majority of the characteristics of the complexes are comparable, three complexes stood out with the lowest catalytic activity (16 % and lower), the highest (most positive) formal redox potentials for Ru-II/Ru-III (E-0 ' of up to +1.4 V), as well as exhibiting some of the smallest energy gaps (as small as 1.21 eV) in the series.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available