4.6 Article

Pathways for the Formation of C2+Productsunder Alkaline Conditions during the Electrochemical Reduction of CO2

Journal

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages 1679-1686

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00167

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program
  2. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC0205CH11231]
  3. [NIH S10OD023532]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the mechanism of CO2RR under experimental conditions and reveals the differences in activation barriers between alkaline and acidic pathways, as well as the kinetic favorability of COH formation under high overpotential.
Establishing how Cu facilitates the electro-chemical CO2reduction reaction (CO2RR) to C2+productsremains a critical challenge. Under typical reaction conditions,the pH near the electrode is considerably more alkaline thanthat in the bulk due to mass transport limitations. Challengeswith probing alkaline pathways using computational methodshave limited understanding of the CO2RR under experimen-tally relevant conditions. In this work, using the Volmerreaction on Cu (100), we demonstrate that predicted activationbarriers can substantially differ between acidic and alkalinepathways. We compute reaction energetics for alkaline*COprotonation andfind that, while the formation of*CHO ispreferred thermodynamically, the formation of*COH isfavored kinetically at high overpotential. However, wefind formation of*CHO via reaction of*H and*CO feasible atroom temperature. We report potential-dependent energetics for forming thefirst C-C bond in CO2RR andfind that COdimerization likely dominates. Finally, we investigate how long-range van der Waals interactions impact our results bycomparing to the meta-GGA B97M-rV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available