4.5 Article

Efficient targeted mutagenesis in soybean by TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 217, Issue -, Pages 90-97

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.11.005

Keywords

Soybean; Genome editing; TALENs; CRISPR/Ca59

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31301342, 31370034]
  2. Key Transgenic Breeding Program of China [2014ZX08004-003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene targeting (GT) is of great significance for advancing basic plant research and crop improvement. Both TALENs (transcription activator-like effectors nucleases) and CRISPR/Ca59 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated 9) systems have been developed for genome editing in eukaryotes, including crop plants. In this work, we present the comparative analysis of these two technologies for two soybean genome editing targets, GmPDS11 and GmPDS18. We found GT in soybean hairy roots with a single targeting efficiency range of 17.5-21.1% by TALENs, 11.7-18.1% by CRISPR/Ca59 using the AtU6-26 promoter, and 43.4-48.1% by CRISPR/Ca59 using the GmU6-16g-1 promoter, suggesting that the CRISPR/Ca59 using the GmU6-16g-1 promoter is probably a much more efficient tool compared to the other technologies. Similarly, our double mutation GT efficiency experiment with these three technologies displayed a targeting efficiency of 6.25% by TALENs, 12.5% by CRISPR/Ca59 using the AtU6-26 promoter, and 43.4-48.1% by CRISPR/Ca59 using the GmU6-16g-1 promoter, suggesting that CRISPR/Ca59 is still a better choice for simultaneous editing of multiple homoeoalleles. Furthermore, we observed albino and dwarf buds (PDS knock-out) by soybean transformation in cotyledon nodes. Our results demonstrated that both TALENs and CRISPR/Ca59 systems are powerful tools for soybean genome editing. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available