4.1 Article

The efficacy and safety of alpelisib in breast cancer: A real-world analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 1152-1156

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/10781552221096413

Keywords

Alpelisib; metastatic; breast cancer; fulvestrant

Funding

  1. Northwestern University Institutional Review Board

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The real-world effectiveness of alpelisib + fulvestrant in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer is worse compared to its efficacy as a first-line treatment. Adverse effects such as hyperglycemia, rash, and diarrhea are frequent and require hospitalization and pharmacological treatment.
Published trials of alpelisib + fulvestrant demonstrate efficacy and high rates of adverse effects as a first-line treatment option for metastatic breast cancer and as an option after cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). The purpose of this analysis is to determine the real-world efficacy and safety of this regimen in heavily pretreated patients. This is a retrospective cohort analysis evaluating patients receiving alpelisib + fulvestrant for hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer who previously received <= 2 lines of therapy in the metastatic setting and those who previously received >= 3 lines of therapy in the metastatic setting. Adverse effects, specifically hyperglycemia, rash, and diarrhea, were reported for the entire population. Thirty-three patients were included in this analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, time to change in therapy, and time to discontinuation were similar in the two groups. Forty-nine percent of patients discontinued alpelisib + fulvestrant due to progression of disease, and 27% of patients discontinued treatment due to adverse effects. Hyperglycemia, rash, and diarrhea occurred at high rates: 66.7%, 45.5%, and 72.7%, respectively. All three of these adverse effects required hospitalizations and pharmacological treatment. This analysis demonstrates that the outcomes of alpelisib + fulvestrant were worse in the real-world salvage setting in HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer as compared to the front-line setting. The real-world tolerability of this regimen is still of great concern.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available