4.1 Article

Clinical utility of a regional precision medicine molecular tumor board and challenges to implementation

Journal

JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 1094-1102

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/10781552221091282

Keywords

Precision medicine; targeted therapy; molecular tumor board; health services research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molecular tumor boards can provide precision treatment recommendations based on genomic profiles, but there are practical barriers to their implementation. In this study, the clinical utility of a precision medicine molecular tumor board (PMMTB) was evaluated, and challenges with its implementation were described. The results show that nonstandard of care (SOC) recommendations from the PMMTB benefited a majority of patients, but there were also barriers such as patient response to current treatment and lack of financial support for treatment.
Purpose Molecular tumor boards provide precision treatment recommendations based on cancer genomic profile. However, practical barriers limit their benefits. We studied the clinical utility of the precision medicine molecular tumor board (PMMTB) and described challenges with PMMTB implementation. Methods An observational cohort study included patients reviewed by the PMMTB between September 2015 to December 2017. Patients who had consented to the registry study were included. The primary endpoint of this study was time on treatment (ToT) ratio. Clinical utility was established if the primary endpoint had least 15% of patients achieving a ToT ratio of >= 1.3. Results Overall, 278 patients were presented to the PMMTB and 113 cases were included in the final analysis. The PMMTB identified at least one nonstandard of care (SOC) clinically actionable mutation for 69.0% (78/113) of cases. In patients who received non-SOC treatment, 43.8% (7/16) achieved a ToT ratio of 1.3 or more (p < 0.001). Fifty-nine patients did not receive non-SOC recommendations. Reasons for not pursuing treatment included 35.6% having response to current treatment, 20.3% died prior to starting or considering PMMTB recommendations, 13.6% pursued other treatment options based on clinician discretion, another 10.2% pursued other treatment options because clinical trials recommended were not geographically accessible, 8.5% had rapid decline of performance status, 6.8% lacked of financial support for treatment, and 5.1% were excluded from clinical trials due to abnormal laboratory values. Conclusion The regional PMMTB non-SOC recommendations benefitted a majority of patients and additional processes were implemented to assist with non-SOC treatment accessibility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available