4.7 Article

Investigating the association between neighbourhood characteristics and e-scooter safety

Journal

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
Volume 83, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103982

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the association between neighborhood characteristics and e-scooter safety in Greater London for the first time. The research findings indicate that the City of London, the West End, and St. James's have the highest expected e-scooter crash frequencies. It is also found that the increase in area-level walking and cycling activities is associated with higher e-scooter crash frequencies, while an increase in the proportion of greenspace is associated with a decrease in crashes involving e-scooters.
The uptake of e-scooters as an alternative mode of travel has risen sharply in recent years; however, their safety is less-understood compared to other modes of travel. For the first time in the extant literature, we explore the association between neighbourhood characteristics and e-scooter safety in Greater London, UK. We found that, over the study period, the expected e-scooter crash frequency was the highest in the City of London, followed by the West End, and then St. James's-both wards located in the borough of Westminster in central London. We found that e-scooter crash frequencies increase with an increase in area-level walking and cycling activities. Similarly, we found that the number of schools is positively associated with the expected e-scooter crash frequency. In contrast, the results indicated that as the proportion of ward-level greenspace increases, the number of crashes involving e-scooters decreases. The results also highlighted social inequalities in this context, with higher e-scooter crash frequencies in areas with larger Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic population, those with higher crime rates, and those with a higher population of children in out of work households. This research provides practical recommendations to prioritise areas for safety interventions and for selecting suitable safety improvement programmes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available