4.6 Article

Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Chip Morphology in Nanogrinding of Monocrystalline Nickel

Journal

COATINGS
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings12050647

Keywords

monocrystalline nickel; molecular dynamics; chip morphology; spherical chip; strip chip; atomic kinetic energy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51966009]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province [20JR5RA462, 20JR5RA442]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the nanogrinding process for single-crystal nickel using molecular dynamics simulation. The results showed that different chip morphologies had significant effects on subsurface damage during the grinding process.
In this study, the nanogrinding process for single-crystal nickel was investigated using a molecular dynamics simulation. A series of simulations were conducted with different tool radii and grinding methods to explore the effects of chip morphology, friction forces, subsurface damage, and defect evolution on the nanogrinding process. The results demonstrate that the workpiece atoms at the back of the tool were affected by the forward stretching and upward elastic recovery when no chips were produced. Although the machining depth was the smallest, the normal force was the largest, and dislocation entanglement was formed. The small number of defect atoms indicates that the extent of subsurface damage was minimal. Moreover, when spherical chips were produced, a typical columnar defect was generated. The displacement vector of the chip atoms aligned with the machining direction and as the chips were removed by extrusion, the crystal structure of the chip atoms disintegrated, resulting in severe subsurface damage. By contrast, when strip chips were produced, the displacement vector of the chip atoms deviated from the substrate, dislocation blocks were formed at the initial stage of machining, and the rebound-to-depth ratio of the machined surface was the smallest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available