4.6 Article

Opinion dynamics in social networks under competition: the role of influencing factors in consensus-reaching

Journal

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211732

Keywords

opinion dynamics; competition; consensus; social network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper develops a social network model based on competitive game to investigate opinion dynamics in a competitive environment. The results show that factors such as resource ratio, initial opinions, self-confidence, and network structure play a crucial role in the final consensus and competition outcomes.
The rapid development of information technology and social media has provided easy access to the vast data on individual preferences and social interactions. Despite a series of problems, such as privacy disclosure and data sensitivity, it cannot be denied that this access also provides beneficial opportunities and convenience for campaigns involving opinion control (e.g. marketing campaigns and political election). The profitability of opinion and the finiteness of individual attention have already spawned extensive competition for individual preferences on social networks. It is necessary to investigate opinion dynamics over social networks in a competitive environment. To this end, this paper develops a novel social network DeGroot model based on competition game (DGCG) to characterize opinion evolution in a competitive opinion dynamics. Social interactions based on trust relationships are captured in the DGCG model. From the model, we then obtain equilibrium results in a stable state of opinion evolution. We also analyse what role relevant factors play in the final consensus and competitive outcomes, including the resource ratio of both contestants, initial opinions, self-confidence and network structure. Theoretical analyses and numerical simulations show that these factors can significantly sway the consensus and even reverse competition outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available