4.7 Article

Effects of surface roughness on the hydrophilic particles-air bubble attachment

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages 3884-3893

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.062

Keywords

Roughness; Particle-bubble attachment; Nanobubbles; Hydrophilicity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51904296]
  2. Science Foundation for Youths of Shanxi Province [201901D211039]
  3. Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia [IF-2020-022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the impact of nanobubbles on the roughed surfaces of glass bead particles and found that the particle roughness could potentially affect the bubble attachment of hydrophilic glass beads.
Bubble-particle attachment is a key factor in various material processing such as wastewater treatment and flotation separation. Nanobubble's formation and its stability on hydrophobic surfaces with and without surfactants have been scientifically proven and extensively studied in various investigations. However, the influence of particle roughness on the hydrophilic particle-air bubble attachment, which could be completely different from hydrophobic particle-bubble attachment in the presence of nanobubbles, has not been addressed. For tackling this gap, the present work investigated the impact of nanobubbles on the roughed surfaces of glass bead particles. The temperature rise technique as a known method was used for micro/nanobubble size generation. The glass beads were modified by the commonly applied abrasion method to create different roughness magnitudes. The particle-bubble assessment results indicated that the particle roughness could potentially affect the bubble attachment of hydrophilic glass beads while the attachment area of smooth particles was almost zero. Outcomes also were revealed that the modified attachment rate constant increased from 0.1180 to 2.2802 s-1 with the increase of particle

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available