4.5 Article

Empirical analysis of recent temporal dynamics of research fields: Annual publications in chemistry and related areas as an example

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2022.101253

Keywords

Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Dynamics of research fields; Chemistry; CA sections; CAplus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a methodological approach to analyze the dynamics of scientific progress at the level of research fields, focusing on the annual number of publications in chemistry. The study reveals that research on optical phenomena and electrochemical technologies has emerged as key topics in recent years.
Changes in the number of publications in a certain field might reflect the dynamic of scientific progress in this field, since an increase in the number of publications can be interpreted as an increase in the field-specific knowledge. In this paper, we present a methodological approach to analyse the dynamics of science on lower aggregation levels, i.e., the level of research fields. Our trend analysis approach is able to uncover very recent trends, and the methods used to study the trends are simple to understand for the possible recipients of the results. In order to demonstrate the trend analysis approach, we focused in this study on the annual number of publications (including patents) in chemistry (and related areas) between 2014 and 2020 identifying those fields in chemistry with the highest dynamics (largest rates of change in publication counts). The study is based on the mono-disciplinary literature database CAplus. Our results reveal that the number of publications in the CAplus database is increasing since many years. Research regarding optical phenomena and electrochemical technologies was found to be among the emerging topics in recent years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available