4.4 Article

Direct and indirect costs of allergic and non-allergic rhinitis to adults in Beijing, China

Journal

CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ALLERGY
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12148

Keywords

China; chronic rhinitis; direct costs; indirect costs

Categories

Funding

  1. program for the Changjiang scholars and innovative research team [IRT13082]
  2. national natural science foundation of China [82071022]
  3. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project [Z181100001618002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the total societal cost for adult AR and NAR patients in Beijing is around euro 440.9 million and euro 671.9 million per year respectively. Factors such as patient's level of education, disease duration, predilection time of disease, severity of symptoms and comorbidity with other allergic diseases all affect the economic burden on patients with rhinitis.
Background Chronic rhinitis is generally classified as either allergic rhinitis (AR) or non-allergic rhinitis (NAR). There is currently no report on the economic burden of AR and NAR in Beijing, China. Methodology A total of 1013 valid questionnaires from 448 AR patients and 565 NAR patients living in Beijing were continuously collected for investigation of the direct (e.g., drugs, medical visits) and indirect costs (absenteeism and presenteeism) from August 2020 to April 2021. Results and Conclusion The total cost of AR and NAR was euro 195.6 patient/year and euro 185.3 patient/year respectively. The total societal cost for adult AR and NAR patients in Beijing is around euro 440.9 and euro 671.9 million per year in terms of the standardized prevalence of the diseases. The patient's level of education, disease duration, predilection time of disease, severity of symptoms and comorbidity with other allergic disease were factors that affected the economic burden on patients with rhinitis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available