4.6 Article

Case Report: Exome and RNA Sequencing Identify a Novel de novo Missense Variant in HNRNPK in a Chinese Patient With Au-Kline Syndrome

Journal

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.853028

Keywords

missense variant; Au-Kline syndrome; RNA-seq; hnRNPK; clinical diagnosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports a Chinese patient with Au-Kline syndrome associated with a novel HNRNPK gene variant. The variant is predicted to decrease the affinity for RNA binding. Transcript analysis revealed aberrant expression and splicing of multiple genes, which are functionally related to HNRNPK.
Au-Kline syndrome is a severe multisystemic syndrome characterized by several congenital defects, including intellectual disability. Loss-of-function and missense variants in the HNRNPK gene are associated with a range of dysmorphic features. This report describes an eleven-year-old Chinese boy with intellectual disability and developmental delays. Family-based whole-exome and Sanger sequencing identified a de novo missense variant in HNRNPK (NM_002140.3: c.143T > A, p. Leu48Val). In silico analysis predicted that this variant would be damaged in a highly conserved residue in the K homology 1 (KH1) domain. Bioinformatic analysis showed that the affinity change (Delta Delta G) caused by this variant was -0.033 kcal/mol, indicating that it would have reduced affinity for RNA binding. Transcript analysis of the peripheral blood from this case found 42 aberrantly expressed and 86 aberrantly spliced genes (p-value <0.01). Functional enrichment analysis confirmed that the biological functions of these genes, including protein binding and transcriptional regulation, are associated with HNRNPK. In summary, this study identifies the first Chinese patient with a novel de novo heterozygous HNRNPK gene variant that contributes to Au-Kline syndrome and expands current knowledge of the clinical spectrum of HNRNPK variants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available