4.7 Article Data Paper

Understanding occupants' behaviour, engagement, emotion, and comfort indoors with heterogeneous sensors and wearables

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01347-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Government through the Australian Research Council's Linkage Projects [LP150100246]
  2. Australian Research Council [LP150100246] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a field study at a private school in Melbourne, Australia, using various data collection methods to analyze the relationships between indoor/outdoor climates and students' behaviors/mental states, providing opportunities for future designs of intelligent feedback systems.
We conducted a field study at a K-12 private school in the suburbs of Melbourne, Australia. The data capture contained two elements: First, a 5-month longitudinal field study In-Gauge using two outdoor weather stations, as well as indoor weather stations in 17 classrooms and temperature sensors on the vents of occupant-controlled room air-conditioners; these were collated into individual datasets for each classroom at a 5-minute logging frequency, including additional data on occupant presence. The dataset was used to derive predictive models of how occupants operate room air-conditioning units. Second, we tracked 23 students and 6 teachers in a 4-week cross-sectional study En-Gage, using wearable sensors to log physiological data, as well as daily surveys to query the occupants' thermal comfort, learning engagement, emotions and seating behaviours. Overall, the combined dataset could be used to analyse the relationships between indoor/outdoor climates and students' behaviours/mental states on campus, which provide opportunities for the future design of intelligent feedback systems to benefit both students and staff.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available