4.7 Article Data Paper

An expert-curated global database of online newspaper articles on spiders and spider bites

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01197-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Finnish Museum of Natural History (LUOMUS
  2. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mass media plays a crucial role in shaping and spreading public perception of animal-related risks. In this study, we compiled a global database of online newspaper coverage on human-spider encounters over the past decade. The database includes information on location, content characteristics, errors, expert consultations, and sensationalism assessment. This comprehensive dataset provides a valuable resource for future research and analysis.
Mass media plays an important role in the construction and circulation of risk perception associated with animals. Widely feared groups such as spiders frequently end up in the spotlight of traditional and social media. We compiled an expert-curated global database on the online newspaper coverage of human-spider encounters over the past ten years (2010-2020). This database includes information about the location of each human-spider encounter reported in the news article and a quantitative characterisation of the content-location, presence of photographs of spiders and bites, number and type of errors, consultation of experts, and a subjective assessment of sensationalism. In total, we collected 5348 unique news articles from 81 countries in 40 languages. The database refers to 211 identified and unidentified spider species and 2644 unique human-spider encounters (1121 bites and 147 as deadly bites). To facilitate data reuse, we explain the main caveats that need to be made when analysing this database and discuss research ideas and questions that can be explored with it.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available