4.2 Article

X-ray reflectivity from curved surfaces as illustrated by a graphene layer on molten copper

Journal

JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages 711-720

Publisher

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S1600577522002053

Keywords

X-ray reflectivity; curved surfaces; methods; synchrotron

Funding

  1. European Union [730872, 951943, 736299]
  2. EU [730872]
  3. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [05K19FK2]
  4. Russian Science Foundation [19-72-30009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a method for X-ray reflectivity measurement on highly curved liquid surfaces. With the use of a synchrotron diffractometer equipped with a double crystal beam deflector, the curved surfaces of liquid metals can be measured, providing electron-density profiles with atomic resolution accuracy. The proposed method is successfully applied to study the bare surface of molten copper and molten copper covered by a graphene layer.
The X-ray reflectivity technique can provide out-of-plane electron-density profiles of surfaces, interfaces, and thin films, with atomic resolution accuracy. While current methodologies require high surface flatness, this becomes challenging for naturally curved surfaces, particularly for liquid metals, due to the very high surface tension. Here, the development of X-ray reflectivity measurements with beam sizes of a few tens of micrometres on highly curved liquid surfaces using a synchrotron diffractometer equipped with a double crystal beam deflector is presented. The proposed and developed method, which uses a standard reflectivity theta-2 theta scan, is successfully applied to study in situ the bare surface of molten copper and molten copper covered by a graphene layer grown in situ by chemical vapor deposition. It was found that the roughness of the bare liquid surface of copper at 1400 K is 1.25 +/- 0.10 angstrom, while the graphene layer is separated from the liquid surface by a distance of 1.55 +/- 0.08 angstrom and has a roughness of 1.26 +/- 0.09 angstrom.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available