4.6 Article

3D numerical simulation of GMAW Cold Metal Transfer using response surface methodology

Journal

JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 656-665

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.02.043

Keywords

GMAW; Cold Metal Transfer (CMT); Finite Element Method (FEM); Design of Experiments (DoE); Response Surface Method (RSM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work presents a fast methodology to adjust heat source model parameters that reproduce the evolution of temperatures and distortions of a welded joint. The proposed methodology combines Response Surface Method (RSM) and Finite Element Method (FEM) to simulate and predict thermal and mechanical behavior. This method replaces the trial and error process and saves engineering time.
This work presents a fast methodology to adjust heat source model parameters that reproduce the evolution of temperatures and distortions of a welded joint. This joint is obtained by the Cold Metal Transfer (CMT) process, a variant of the most frequently used gas-shielded metal arc welding (GMAW) process. The proposed methodology combines Response Surface Method (RSM) and Finite Element Method (FEM). The thermal simulation is tackled by a 3D transient FEM-model with a Goldak heat flux; and the mechanical behaviour is addressed by a 3D elastic plastic FEM-model. A Design of Experiments (DoE) is applied to simulate a set of thermal and mechanical FEMmodels varying the heat source parameters. Then, the temperatures and distortions of all simulations are gathered and used to build polynomial regression models that are able to predict temperatures and distortions as functions of the heat flux parameters. Finally, best parameters are found using RSM. The method is based on automation of pre and post processes that replaces the trial and error process, which involves large amount of engineering time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available