Journal
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 32, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100610
Keywords
Systems thinking; Leverage points; Food systems; Healthy and sustainable; Food policy; Transformational change
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Numerous major reports have made wide-ranging recommendations for achieving transformative food systems change, but the transformative potential of these recommendations has not been analyzed yet. A documentary analysis found that very few reports made recommendations that addressed the leverage points necessary for truly transformative change in food systems. The majority of recommendations focused on adjustment or reform rather than transformation.
Today's food systems are driving several intersecting public health and ecological crises of global concern. Acknowledging this, numerous major reports have made wide-ranging recommendations for achieving 'transformative' food systems change. However, no studies have yet analysed the transformative potential of these recommendations. Here we undertake a documentary analysis to assess the transformative potential of the recommendations of forty-one such reports. The report recommendations were coded against three systems science frameworks and organised by year published and actor type. We found a low number of reports made recommendations tackling food systems leverage points necessary to affect truly transformative change. Recommendations tended to ignore political economy factors, including power asymmetries between actors. The majority of recommendations were limited to adjusting or reforming rather than transforming food systems, indicating a mismatch between rhetoric and potential action.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available