4.8 Review

Long Non-Coding RNAs in the Cell Fate Determination of Neoplastic Thymic Epithelial Cells

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.867181

Keywords

thymoma; thymic carcinoma; thymic epithelial tumors (TETs); ncRNAs (non coding RNAs); miRNA; microRNA; lncRNA; long noncoding RNA; MALAT1; myasthenia gravis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review focuses on the role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in thymic epithelial tumor development and discusses their potential as targets for novel therapeutic approaches. In addition, the involvement of lncRNAs in myasthenia gravis (MG)-related thymoma is also highlighted.
Thymic Epithelial Tumors (TETs) arise from epithelial cells of the thymus and are very rare neoplasms comprising Thymoma, Thymic carcinoma, and Thymic Neuroendocrine tumors that still require in-depth molecular characterization. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging as relevant gene expression modulators involved in the deregulation of several networks in almost all types of human cancer, including TETs. LncRNAs act at different control levels in the regulation of gene expression, from transcription to translation, and modulate several pathways relevant to cell fate determination under normal and pathological conditions. The activity of lncRNAs is strongly dependent on their expression, localization, and post-transcriptional modifications. Starting from our recently published studies, this review focuses on the involvement of lncRNAs in the acquisition of malignant traits by neoplastic thymic epithelial cells, and describes the possible use of these molecules as targets for the design of novel therapeutic approaches specific for TET. Furthermore, the involvement of lncRNAs in myasthenia gravis (MG)-related thymoma, which is still under investigation, is discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available