4.7 Article

Mobile Near-Field Measurements of Biomass Burning Volatile Organic Compounds: Emission Ratios and Factor Analysis

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 383-390

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00194

Keywords

volatile organic compounds; biomass burning; PTR TOF-MS; mobile measurements

Funding

  1. NOAA [NA16OAR4310104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Comprehensive measurement and analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxygenated VOCs emitted from wildfires are crucial for understanding and controlling ozone and secondary organic aerosol formation. This study used cutting-edge instruments to sample real-world fires and compared the results with controlled lab experiments, finding consistent emission ratios.
Comprehensive measurements of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxygenated VOCs that are emitted from wildfires are important inputs for constraining ozone and secondary organic aerosol formation potential in chemical transport models. Using Vocus proton-transfer reaction mass spectrometer and tunable infrared laser direct absorption spectroscopy instruments on a mobile laboratory during the Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality (FIREX-AQ) 2018 and 2019 campaigns, seven different fires over two years were sampled from <10 km away providing extensive chemical composition and aging information about emissions of VOCs and oxidized VOCs from fires. Several of these fires were sampled <300 m from burning fuels, yielding insight into relatively fresh smoke measurements. The emission ratios reported here are statistically consistent with measurements of controlled fires in a laboratory setting. Chemically unique mass spectral signatures of low- and high-temperature pyrolysis are determined from factor analysis while sampling real-world fires burning in heterogeneous stages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available