4.7 Article

Extrapolating Empirical Models of Satellite-Observed Global Mean Sea Level to Estimate Future Sea Level Change

Journal

EARTHS FUTURE
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021EF002290

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA Sea Level Change Team (N-SLCT) [80NSSC20K1123, 80NSSC17K0564]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using satellite altimetry data from 1993-2020, we estimated a quadratic model to analyze the climate-driven global mean sea level change. We also accounted for errors in the quadratic coefficients and projected the model 30 years into the future to 2050, with a 90% confidence interval. Our findings suggest that the global mean sea level in 2050 will be 16.4 cm higher than in 2020, with an uncertainty range of 11.3-21.4 cm. This prediction aligns with the sea level projections of IPCC SROCC and AR6, and the hindcast extrapolation prior to 1993 matches well with tide gauge records. We believe this highlights the value of short-term observationally driven extrapolations as an additional tool for predicting future sea level change.
We estimate a quadratic model of climate-driven global mean sea level (GMSL) change based on the satellite altimetry record (1993-2020), including a rigorous assessment of the errors in the quadratic coefficients. We then extrapolate this model 30 years into the future to 2050 and compute the 90% confidence interval. We find GMSL rise in 2050 relative to 2020 will be 16.4 cm higher, with an uncertainty range of 11.3-21.4 cm. This prediction agrees within uncertainties with IPCC SROCC and AR6 sea level projections. In addition, a hindcast extrapolation prior to 1993 agrees well with the tide gauge record of GMSL change over the 2nd half of the 20th century. We believe this shows the value of short-term observationally driven extrapolations as an additional tool for predicting future sea level change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available